Monday, December 13, 2010

Taboo You
It's too bad the National Performance Network's amazing Dallas showcase was one-time only.
by Ellie Leonhardt
published Sunday, December 12, 2010

fill
photo: National Performance Network
Jane Comfort's "Faith Healing"

The National Performance Network held its 25th anniversary annual meeting in Dallas this weekend. As part of the conference, two performance showcases, called "Taboos in the Night," were given at the beautiful but in-need-of-renovation Majestic Theatre in downtown Dallas.

All of the pieces presented on Friday and Saturday night were recreations of projects/performances of dance and theater that will be remounted at theaters in 15 cities across the country. This showcase gives the presenters a chance to relive memories of these pieces as well as educate new presenters to the quality and style of work that NPN likes to support.

Pomo Afro Homos kicked it off Friday with a “remix” of Fierce Love: Stories from Black Gay Life. The lively, moving and entertaining stories of identity told by the black queer performance ensemble uses humor and dramatic pauses to help the audience ask deep questions about stereotypes, one’s first sexual experience as a definition of the self, relationships struggles, and death of a loved one. Many of the scenes are short vignettes of duets, solos and trios that use movement, sound effects, imagination and song to help support the script’s message. The piece closes by asking the audience to ponder why “people bundle up their pain and go silently into the night.”

The message is centered on the healing of one’s community and one’s acceptance and the embrace of one’s identity. The language and cultural references offer a poetic and often abstract window into the characters’ innocent struggle to find, accept and celebrate being a black gay man in San Francisco.

The second piece on the show was Elia Arce’s First Woman on the Moon. This piece was promising, but needs more editing and rehearsal as the transition between ideas took up as much time as the ideas themselves.

The last piece on the Friday was Pat Graney’s Faith (premiered in 1991). Graney is a choreographer based in Seattle who, for the past 15 years, has created an innovative program called Keeping the Faith (which brings Graney’s work to women and girls in prisons). It is clear that Graney is an artist who thinks deeply about life and art.

Faith is a dance split into four sections, inspired by Caravaggio and Michelangelo’s paintings, the writing of Roshi Juiyu Kennett, Francesco Clemente and the animation work of Rybczynski. All of the influences are evident in the work, but the most obvious reference is how the images of the paintings are transferred to the stage: The first of the four sections shows the cast of seven women frequently moving slowly to a new position on stage to stop and pause in the familiar Renaissance shapes.

Occasionally, women in dark velvet dresses would diverge into a solo against the group and then be lifted or carried across the stage to then softly, with a few subtle pauses, lie back down onto the ground. The phrase of the pausing coordinates with the breath of the singers in the choral style mass composed by Arvo Part. The use of levels, diagonals, and shapes with soft lines is repeatedly lush and soothing to the eye. The first section of the dance, choreographically, is by far the most successful and could stand on its own.

The second section of Faith involves the manipulation of small red physioballs. The dancers playfully manipulate the shapes and relationships made in the first section by using the red balls to add new elements such as sliding, rolling and running to the movement vocabulary. In the third section, the velvet dresses reappear with no sleeves as a soloist, downstage left, caresses and puts on a pair of red high-heeled shoes.

The dance continues to evolve the movement shapes from the first section, and the playful speed and momentum of the second. As the harshness of this section evolves, it is clear that the shoes manipulate the dancers in a uniform manner. The symbolism of the shoes suggests that the women feel a special power and sexiness by wearing these shoes (designed by men), yet as this section progresses it is also these shoes that cause the women’s neurosis. As the dancers break off from the unison striding, the women take turns lying on their backs shaking and writhing as if to try to get the shoes off or as if the shoes have an electric power over her body. At the end of this section the same soloist mentioned above presents a gesture of her right hand erratically touching the side of her face. The expression on her face is a cross between confusion, pain and delirium.

As the lights go out on the soloist, the music begins to fade into a whispering man saying the Lord’s Prayer. Graney uses the prayer to segue to the last section of the dance in which the bodies of the women lay in a clump upstage left. The bodies are lit by a warm sidelight that slowly reveals naked curvy bodies moving in a meditative slowness. The movement vocabulary and pacing quickly reverts back to that seen in the first section. As the dancers face upstage the line made by the symmetrical shape of the torso is striking. The unique shape of the women’s hips shows how under the velvet dress and behind the sexy walk we are all unique, and it is in this beauty of the body that we are most connected to our spirit and faith.

With lack of traditional modern dance movement phrases, Graney presents several false endings and finally settles on bring the women in red high heels back onstage while one woman is left nude on the floor appearing to repent her sins by kneeling and gently touching her face. Graney pulls her audience through a narrative of subtle mazes, processes, and evolutions of women’s rolls and collective experience. Though this piece does not present a direct narrative, as do the other pieces on the showcase, I imagine that the women in the prison system are able to see Graney’s work and can relate deeply to the self-expression and thoughtful dance/art creation.

The Saturday night performance showcased two hybrid dance/theater works. Both of these pieces had an American theme. The first was Jane Comfort’s take and deconstruction of the Tennessee Williams’ play The Glass Menagerie. As the program note states: “it utilizes fantasies and movie scenes to underline the play’s subtext of desire and memory.” This quote, in a nutshell, sums up what was presented on stage.

The highlight of Comfort’s work, excerpts from Faith Healing created in 1993, is a movement scene between the characters of Laura and O’Connor in which the actors begin mouthing the lines of Lois Lane and Superman, as sound from the Superman movie plays over the speakers. The actors begin to reenact the part of the movie in which Superman takes Lois Lane flying.

The characters run around the stage in a large circular pattern, as if they were little kids trying to get up the momentum to take off. Eventually the pair lands center stage on their bellies over two stools. They have their arms and legs outstretched and because they have become static it appears for a brief moment like they are flying. The use of Comfort’s humor is evident with the next crescendo of the music―the characters lift the left sides of their bodies as if turning like an airplane would.

The audience can’t help but laugh in the delight and freedom the image provides. Even though Comfort’s deconstructions are often intelligent, the energy of any Williams’ text or concept could not stand up to the next piece on the program.

Word Becomes Flesh is a powerful performance written and directed by Marc Bamuthi Joseph. The recreation of this work from 2003 is defined as a “choreopoem.” It fuses text, hip-hop, music, gesture, dance, monologue, spoken word and autobiography. The version seen on Saturday is a one-man play transposed to a group of five young African-American male performers. The text, rich with poetry and breath, delivers Joseph’s diary told to his unborn son. The actors convey the transformative process with clarity and expansive emotion. Frequently, the unborn son’s heartbeat is heard as the actors speak over, around and through the sound.

The piece ends in a climactic moment when Joseph himself enters upstage and begins to move in the most magnificent way―slapping the floor, limbs flying, center strong and stable. (The other performers unfortunately do not match Joseph’s explosive movement quality). As Joseph dances, he tells the audience that his son is now 9 and reveals that his grandfather’s death is connected to his son’s birth. Joseph pointedly asks the question directly to his son: “Do you know who you are?” Joseph wants his son “to grow up like good music, I want you to last,” as one of the performers spoke earlier in the piece.

Muscle memory, myth, pain, change, transformation, what it means to be black in America, paradox, ignorance, hate, racism, cultural references are just some of the themes used to hit the audience with truth and identity of this honest and captivating story.

Ellie Leonhardt is a Lecturer of Dance in the Dance and Theater Department at the University of North Texas.

http://www.theaterjones.com/reviews/20101212091733/2010-12-12/National-Performance-Network/Taboos-in-the-Night

Monday, November 29, 2010

Leading a traditional Marian Chace movement circle as a warm up for modern technique students






Photographs taken by Amanda Will. Dancers in photos: Jake Bone, Jessica Holt, Shannon Sauer, Tyler Patterson, Audrey Kennedy, and Katie Jennings

Saturday, November 13, 2010

Aikido...

Grasping at The Law of Attraction? Do This Instead and Enjoy Success

By Kristopher Raphael (Entries in the Handbook fro Planet Earth)

Wed, Jun 24, 2009

What is wrong with its seeking the pleasant and shirking the unpleasant? Between the banks of pain and pleasure the river of life flows. It is only when the mind refuses to flow with life, and gets stuck at the banks, that it becomes a problem. By flowing with life I mean acceptance — letting come what comes and go what goes. Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj, I Am That


Aikido - In The Flow

Aikido - In The Flow

If you push someone what happens? Chances are they will push back. If you grab someone’s hand and pull them, what happens? They pull away from you. If someone is needy and is grasping at you for your love and attention, what do you do? Most people pull away. Grasping at something you want can actually stop you from having it. Repelling something you don’t want, can make it push at you even harder.

People grasp and repel in many arenas in life. They grasp at things they want. They grasp at receiving pleasure. They repel people and things they don’t like. What they don’t realize is that the constant grasping and repelling, not only creates the outcome they don’t want, but puts them in a lot of stress and drains their energy.

In personal development, grasping and repelling will stop you in your tracks. You can’ heal something you avoid looking at. If you avoid and deny that you have an alcohol problem, for example, the problem will persist, or get worse. It is only through shining the transformative light of awareness on something that it can heal and be integrated.

If you wish to manifest your hopes, dreams and desires and activate the Law of Attraction, the best state to do this in is being in the flow of life. You must allow what you desire to be, not grasp at it. Grasping at something implies that you don’t have it. If you don’t energetically have it first, you won’t have it in form.

When you allow both the good and the bad without grasping and repelling, you enter into the the powerful flow of the now moment that flows through self and all of life. You naturally move into a state of well being that is more aligned with your desires manifest, activating the Law of Attraction.

There is a powerful Japanese martial art form called Aikido. Ai means harmony. Ki means spirit. Do means ‘the way of’ or ‘the road to’. In other words, Aikido means ‘the way of harmonized spirit’. The key difference between Aikido and other martial arts is that you don’t repel or block a person attacking you, you flow with punch or kick, using the energy of their momentum for yourself.

Do this in your life and you will have more energy to manifest what you wish to manifest. Instead of resisting things you don’t like and pushing them away, simply allow them to flow through you and dissapate. This puts you in the universal flow of life as you move into living in the now moment.

Be aware of where you are grasping at things in life. Imagine having your desires manifest. Grow the sensation of your desires manifest in your inner world. Do this without grasping at them and you allow them to move from being to having. Grasping prevents the having. For example, if you wish more abundance in your life, imagine yourself being abundant. Imagine what you will buy, what you will do, and most importantly how good you will feel with your abundance. If you are grasping at it, it means you don’t yet have it. Let the grasping go and have it in your inner world (your thoughts, feelings and imagination). As you do this you open the door to having it in your outer world as well.

Living in the Flow has other advantages. One obvious one is that when you are not repelling or grasping at things in life, you have more energy, and less stress. You are more relaxed and because of this are able to get more done in less time. One can only surmise that living a relaxed, stress free life with more energy would be better for your health and longevity.

Want to increase your well-being and more powerfully activate the Law of Attraction in your life? Be aware of where you grasp and repel in your life. Consciously let the grasping and repelling go. Allow whatever is to be. As you do so, you begin to live in the Flow where all good things reside.

http://kristopher-raphael.com/grasping-at-the-law-of-attraction

Monday, November 8, 2010

Saturday, November 6, 2010

Dance for Life—and Death

Jose Zamora's CholoRock Dance Theatre explores it all in an energetic show in Denton.
by Ellie Leonhardt
published Tuesday, November 2, 2010

photo: Jennifer Fronczeck
La Fiesta Fantasmagorica

In a 60-minute show with energy that isn't bounded by the intimate Green Space Arts Collective studio in Denton, José Zamora’s CholoRock Dance Theatre opened La Fiesta Fantasmagorica 2010 this weekend.

Zamora, a recent dance graduate from Texas Woman's University, explores a sophisticated Mexican-American cultural blend of post-modern, folklórico, social dance, hip-hop, contemporary ballet and jazz. Zamora has created his own recipe of dance folktales and appears to have a hold on a strong, signature blend of dance fusion. La Fiesta Fantasmagorica goes beyond the actions of the dancers or the intricate rhythm of the steps and digs deep into cultural themes such as death, intimacy, sexuality, gender and culture.

It is pleasure to see a choreographer use group forms that support interesting movement vocabulary, made up of twisting, throwing, pulsing, pushing and dense rhythmic structures.

The form of the show is broken into seamless sections in which Zamora allows us to telescope into the solo life of a character, or the relationship of a duet. These vignettes, surrounded by larger ensemble pieces, give the audience a feeling that, by the end of the show, we tangibly know each of the abstract and whimsical characters.

It is through the solos at the beginning of the piece that the audience has a moment to contemplate the life and, with the help of haunting facial makeup, the death of Zamora’s characters.

The most dynamic of these solos is danced by principle dancer Kasi Kirkpatrick, who appears in a yellow girlish dress, at first waving her arms and moving through the space like a bird with an arrhythmic skip. Her solo is made up of quick direction changes and level changes that grow to an eerie climax. The climax comes when a smile emerges on her face and she begins to giggle and then―as if out of nowhere―act as if she is being chocked to death. Zamora is a master at skillful, genuine character development that gives the audience a feeling that we are witnessing the dead vibrantly dancing on their last-lived day.

By the end section of the piece, Zamora has his dancers wearing surgical masks and dancing a traditional couple dance―bodies pressed together. The juxtaposition shows Zamora’s ability to play with irony and intimacy, all in the same breath. The collage of visual and sonic elements and the abstract narrative performed by a physically diverse and unique cast (including a notable performance from co-principle dancer Juan Pablo Montes) allows Zamora’s choreographic intention to be clearly communicated.

Groupings of dancers merge and emerge organically, with a strong sense of character and motivation, as every inch of the small stage is used and devoured by the dancers leaping, rolling, running, spinning and lifting each other. These dynamic movements are made even stronger by the use of interwoven spatial formations, attention to choreographic details and technically efficient dancers.

It's described as a “bizarre and fantastic combination,” and it is. The themes explored—including sexuality, death and life—ultimately blossom into one of humanity.

There is one more performance of La Fiesta Fantasmagorica, and you'll have to witness it for yourself.

Ellie Leonhardt is a Lecturer in Dance at the University of North Texas, and lives in Denton

http://www.theaterjones.com/reviews/20101101214533/2010-11-02/CholoRock-Dance-Theatre/La-Fiesta-Fantasmagorica

Flight On Time

photo: Marty Sohl






Flight On Time
DanceTCU flies into fall with a showcase of classical and modern.
by Ellie Leonhardt
published Saturday, November 6, 2010

In the faculty and guest works in DanceTCU’s “Flying Into Fall” showcase, classical and modern dance are on display, with every performance representative of the confident dancers that Texas Christian University produces. Even when the works tend to more modern, a classical body type is exhibited: young, skinny, agile, flexible, dynamic, sharp and serious.

One of the highlights of the show is Elizabeth Gillaspy’s Vigil (2005). This contemporary ballet presents a heightened use of musicality, spatial relationships and gesture to portray three women who are lost and searching for solace. Interestingly, the solace they are looking for is not in themselves nor in each other, but in something that exists beyond the stage.

The dancers start out in a formation of a wide triangle. As they move out of this formation, with an inner focus, they do simultaneous variations of each other’s movements. The trio never comes into unison until the climax of the dance, in which all three young women stand downstage left and scan the horizon, out into the audience, with their eyes and faces. This external use of focus is echoed when a solo dancer repeats the unison gesture of the visual scan in synchronicity with the last climactic note of Arvo Part’s haunting music (frequently used by many choreographers). Although the dancers are proficient in the technique, one wonders if these young women really understand the anguish they are portraying in Gillaspy’s poetic work.

The last piece on the program is Scorching Bay, by former Battleworks, Mark Morris and Ailey II dancer Kanji Segawa. This piece is the most polished and cohesive on the concert and plays with alternating phrases and spatial formations of bounded lines and free-flowing curves.

In it, many interesting uses of group forms catch the eye. The dance begins with a man standing stage left and a woman running toward him and jumping into his arms (as if to quote Esplanade by Paul Taylor). After several runs, each of the dancers on the floor lift up one arm in rapid succession as the woman runs past. This cannon allows the dancer to move through an abstract architectural environment that creates a visual separation between the principle dancers and the audience (the lighting by Roma Flowers and the costumes on loan from the Ailey School help this effect).

Another interesting moment comes in the middle of the dance, when most of the cast is spread across the stage, holding a group shape made up of duets and trio. This crowd moves seamlessly off stag eright while holding the group shape―like a finger swipe on a giant Iphone. Behind this image, a trio emerges that focuses on another male/female duet. The two highlighted female dancers, Elizabeth Alvarez and Alexa Moore, are sharp, clear, grounded, risky and confident in attacking Segawa’s movement style and vocabulary. The dance ends with the first female soloist running in a circle downstage center, as the lights fade.

The ongoing backwards running throughout the last half of the dance suggests that the woman by the end of the piece is trying to return to where the dance started―jumping into the arms of a man. Or, perhaps now that she is by herself, no longer in a duet, she is running for her freedom, with the pulse of the music supporting her escape. Choreographically it seems as if the end of the piece could easily segue right back into the beginning, and the whole dance could be on an endless loop cycle.

Because there is no linking theme or stylistic connection to the pieces on "Flying Into Fall," the programming leaves much to be desired. While much of the inquiry and creative exploration does not dig terribly deep, the classical body of ballet and modern dance is showcased with confident technique.

The remainder of the program includes works that highlight this confidence, choreographed by John McFall, Jenny Mendez, Susan Douglas Roberts and Heinz Spoerli (re-staged by Li-Chou Cheng).

◊ Ellie Leonhardt is a Lecturer in Dance at the University of North Texas. She lives in Denton.

http://www.theaterjones.com/reviews/20101106164250/2010-11-06/DanceTCU/Flying-Into-Fall

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

photos of me performing Encapsulating at the Dumbo Dance Festival



This is a new poem that I wrote for Satellite-Dance Theater's new choreography, Vessel

“The world is hungry, even the wind is biting” –Josh Ritter

Vessel

Scraping at the bottom
Feet crossed and legs lengthened
Under my weight is the curve
The curving steel and brass and bones

I am carving for a way out
Held down under the ship
under the ocean
Hovering right above where the earth begins

____________________


Oscillating and tripling out underneath
The way of the waves
I can follow through
I can’t find where to meet you
or where to turn to
One on top of the other – it keeps
happening, one on top of the other
one on top of the other

____________________


Where is this place?
(I think it is home)
crossing through
one against two
again and again
one against two
the next/ the next/ the next

____________________
Changing places
around me

everything falls to the right
everything falls to the left

The LAND is 3,999 feet high
(How will I get there?)
I am down below on this ship my grandfather built

The beginning is the ending to what you are giving me
(What are you giving me?)
____________________

In togetherness there is nothingness
____________________

Lines and space and curves and eights and nines and tens

Where one wave doesn’t line up with the next
Where the rhythms are off and struggle to circle back round

The rhythm pulls back and finishes the tarnish on the steel
rimmed
trim
of the boat

We are ALL on this boat
NOT just you, NOT just me
ALL of us
WHOLE body

Our feel tied to its mass as it sinks:
Get out of my hands
Get out of my hair
Get our of my back

I keep going/ keep going/ keep going
____________________

Not all at the same time

Circling for air…

Slowly moving down and looking up
to the edge of the cliff
where I sink, where I try to climb
from the water to the land
asking myself to be

crossed over or crossed under

or crossed off

gone forever…

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Personal Reflection from CITE

July 17, 2010

Reflections on Contact Improvisation in the Academy: An essay review of CITE

From June 17-20, 2010 I attended the Contact Improvisation Teachers’ Exchange (CITE): Contact in the Academy at Connecticut College with about 25 other teachers from around the US (most of whom were teaching in the academy). The following are some of the thoughts and questions that have stayed with me since that conference. I am eager to share them because I have found that, in teaching in academia, it is easy to be isolated and that CQ and CITE events are fantastic ways to reconnect to the truth of the form we love. What I explore in this essay is how the academy is changing my views of dance and teaching. Specifically, post-conference, I am left with these questions:

1. What is important about CI? What is the essential nature of CI that I am trying to teach?

2. How are the values of CI and the academy different yet, on the surface, similar?

3. How does this conflict in values affect me as a teacher? What is the most efficient way to navigate this conflict?

4. How does the form of CI change because the human experience of the teacher has changed?

5. How can the academy better support subjective subjects (such as dance and somatics)?

One of the most important reminders that came out of the CITE discussions was how contact improvisation prioritizes teaching people to be themselves. As those who are familiar with CI know, this idea of self is expressed through community, physical expression, and verbal/artistic sharing. As I travel away from the conference I wonder (perhaps idealistically): Why can’t these important aspects of contact improvisation be an integral part of how the academy functions?

On the surface the academy and CI have very similar goals. Both want to improve the lives of others through information, understanding, fairness/justice, and connection. But, the values and goals of how dance functions within the academy are often not as concurrent as they might seem from the outside.

One of the themes of the conference was framed by the organizers in the form of a question: Will CI be kept alive by the academy? In my opinion, the short answer is, yes, CI in the academy will survive so long as teachers are willing to fight for it. Because of budget concerns, dance is often encouraged to be a part of a larger department so as to not be cut. Thus, dance within the structure of the academy is often set up as a second class citizen to theater, physical education or, in some cases, kinesiology. With the right leadership these subjects can really work well together but the reality is that dance is a deep and intricate subject with several sub-subjects within itself. Therefore mergers and reorganizations (that often seem to benefit the “corporate” interests of the academy more so than the students) frequently can cause dance faculty to veer away from the inherent goals of the subject.

Many of us in the dance world already know that dance (especially dance improvisation) is not a priority to our culture but we keep doing it because it is essential to our way of being. It is easy for a dance teacher within the academy to find herself caught up in the cultural climate such that the ideals of dance and CI are no longer important. “The academy will kill the CI teacher” was how one member of the group from the conference put it. Although teachers are resilient in many ways, the question is clear: Does the form change because the teacher is no longer able to truly model the philosophical cornerstones of CI when forced to meet the corporate regulations of the academy? Again, from my point of view, the answer is still yes. The emotional skills of intimacy that are (hopefully) taught in CI, in the right environment, can transform the identity of the person teaching and learning the form. If these skills change because of the demands of the corporate academy, then the way the teacher teaches changes and thus the form changes.

Although I teach in a small department in a very large public university – where the corporate model is in full effect – I know this model can also have similar influence in a small liberal arts environment. Although on some level this challenge could be for the better (e.g. provoking creativity in the face of competition), it seems to me that it is frequently for the worse because of the human toll - often translating into oppression in the work place. This oppression, in turn, often creates a contradiction of values. It is important for the teacher to interact with the students in the same way in which she interacts with co-faculty and administrators. All to often, however, the teacher is not able to practice what she preaches in the classroom or in the conference room. To model the CI form, one must model community on all levels in order to make the work the in the classroom and the academy effective. Because the CI philosophy of being one’s self and investigating the unknown is the way I want to be and the way I want the world to be, I find the oppressive nature of teaching in an environment that does not prioritize the human effect of the operation very difficult to traverse and transcend.

I frequently ask myself these questions about the academy: How can we as teachers in the academy stay true to the form and survive such tense relations either with other faculty or administrators who have different values? As it was suggested at the conference, we can invite administrators to our concerts and to our classes but when they don’t show up (and often don’t even know where to begin to engage with dance as art) the cycle of hopelessness is easy to accept. We can educate the academy as well but do they know or actually really care about the value of the education that comes through a subjective form like CI? How do we as a CI community convince them?

For most contact teachers the form is personal and essential. The academy, including classical modern dance teachers, doesn’t always connect to something so subjective. This is why it is difficult to fight for improvisational dance in the academy and all the reason more one must try. The fight can ruin teachers and it can also save teachers.

The main CI personality trait that I see changing in people that go into academia, and a topic discussed at the conference, is generosity. Academics often do not tend to be generous toward each other. The ubiquitous in-fighting and political posturing creates an oppressive environment that can only be changed through proactive leadership. Even then, if one is lucky enough to have a proactive leader for dance, it is rarely a stable situation as administrators are often cut or resign and are tested unfairly through the bureaucratic system that leads most to a depleted spirit. How can a system of depleted spirits teach the true meaning and essence of CI?

The real question for me is how can I remain true to myself in this type of environment that does not prioritize the values that I see so vibrantly in most contact communities? How can I help change this type of environment in academia? Can I be one of the surviving contactors that still models the spirit of CI even if I am surrounded by situations that will take advantage of my generosity, courage, listening, vulnerability, and openness? Or, will these traits slowly change under this pressure forcing me to no longer be able to be the person I want to be?

The reality that a dance teacher (especially a female dance teacher) is replaceable and that arts are often a lower priority is a fact that makes one have to work extra hard to fight for his or her job, and/or live in fear that one’s department will be cut. Since higher education institutions are the leaders of the humanities and are the main cultural support and frequent promoters of subjective inquiry, it is surprising to me that the human (emotional/moral) impact of the academy on the faculty is not a top priority of operation. I have noticed in working at different schools that if teachers feel secure and supported in their roll by the institution then they often pass this way of being to the students. Since CI is about support and connection, CI can model an ideal way of operation for the academy, if they are open and willing to listen.

CITE gave me an opportunity to see that there is some hope that the academy is able to listen. The challenges will be ongoing as CI finds its place in the academy.

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Audience feedback from my new dance presented at DNA

These are comments from the audience at the premier of my new solo "Caught. Catching" at Dance New Amsterdam in NYC on 9/18.

"In the first section you looked like someone caught in a rainstorm, unsure of where to find shelter. The "ding" element to the music was synced well to your movements. When I saw your face on the screen, it was jarring an broke an illusion, or mirrored your physical presence, in a way, but I interpreted it as you thinking about your self."

"Precision is awesome = sound and movement, the little "tings" that match your action. More of this! Screen images are interesting but too much white space. I really like the moments when you face the audience. Great use of space and floor."

"Human movements to non-human sounds. Snooze button: in and out, off and on. White noise."

"Reminded me of sad/painful memories one would try to leave behind, but maybe that is just me. I liked the rain sound/image... it had some comfort in it..."

"The precise starts and stops of motion with the light/sound of light and the chime stood out and was so impressive. I could see more of those in the piece."

"Very intriguing- Was curious to see more on the screen so it kept my attention. The soft rain sound with the bell sound was unique."

"What's the connection between the screen and the dress? Really like the light and music noise."

"Alone in personal storm. Moments of stillness/reflection. Rich/vibrant. Made me want to breathe deeply to feel the moisture in air."

"I enjoyed when the images on the screen were more faint, ghostly. The beginning of the piece reminded me of a storm at sea, someone trying to gain control. The dress for me was reminiscent of the Wizard of Oz. I don't know why you left the stage at the end. I liked the interaction of the dancer and the sound/images person."

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

dance  writing, reviews and discourse

Texas Dance Improvisation Festival

by Nichelle Strzepek

September 20, 2010

Don't call it improv. Not only does it look like a typo in print but, as Leslie Scates, one of Houston's leading improvisational dance artists will tell you, “using "improv" continues to connote the work as casual.” In fact, it takes a particular kind of dexterity, vital to today's dancer, to go beyond auto-pilot in improvisation and the preparation that goes into pulling off a spontaneous masterpiece is anything but casual. It's no surprise then that The Second Annual Texas Dance Improvisation Festival (TDIF), to be hosted by Rice University October 7-9, is filling up with registrants from the widespread cities of Texas.

“Improvisational dance is a form that demands as much practice, intention and craft as any other dance technique,” says Rosie Trump, co-facilitator of this year’s event and Assistant Director of Rice University Dance Department. Addressing the need for a Texas-based event, she adds, “This is a legitimate form with a recognized lineage and secure future. Although TDIF is a relatively young festival, there are dance improvisation festivals that happen all over the country and internationally.”

The event, conceived by Jordan Fuchs, was facilitated in its inaugural year by he and Sarah Gamble at Texas Women’s University Department of Dance. As an attendant of that event, it was Scates who advocated for bringing the traveling festival to Houston for its sophomore assembly.

Funded in part by grants from the City of Houston Mayor's Special Initiatives Grant program of the Houston Arts Alliance, TDIF will kick off with an improvisation jam at 6pm on Thursday, October 7.

Two full days of improvisation classes will follow. Movers of all types and improvisational novices are welcome to register for the festival classes. “Because you define the physicality in your dancing while improvising, it can be very appealing to all levels,” says Trump. "We have a variety of sessions to suit registrants at different stages of experience."

Describing what even veteran performers and students have to gain from studying the craft of improvisation, Scates says, “Improvising teaches them to pay attention to choice-making in their dancing brain. It turns their bodies into 3D dancing instruments rather than instruments that constantly get and require feedback from a mirror or a particular ‘front.' It teaches them to craft movement for repeatable choreography, improvise with other bodies and vocabularies, and to see other people as source material providers and not competition." She points out that the related practice of contact improvisation "provides ample technique for creating partnering and becoming a versatile post modern dance machine.”

This year, TDIF will welcome Los Angles based dancer, improviser and arts activist, Meg Wolfe as its featured guest. “She is this visionary force in the LA dance scene,” explains Trump. Adding that “Southern California is a difficult place to navigate as a dance artist," Trump explains that Wolfe curates Anatomy Riot, a regular choreography showcase; organizes a master class series called DanceBANK; co-edits the L.A. dance journal, and is the coordinator for a new grant program in Southern California. "I am very excited about what she will be able to share with the Texas dance community, because so much of what she has initiated has been done without institutional or traditional support systems,” remarks Trump.

In addition to classes, two evening jams and a panel discussion will all take place at Rice University’s Barbara and David Gibbs Recreation Center, 6100 Main St, Rice University.

A performance and closing jam will be presented Saturday, October 9 at Barnevelder Movement Arts Complex, 2201 Preston, in downtown Houston.

Though the movement will be unplanned, Scates insists that there is no “phoning it in” during true performance, improvisational or otherwise. “Improvisers rehearse. Improvisers create scores so that the craft of improvising choreography has a setting, limits, definition and intent. Improvisers learn to capitalize on a brilliant moment and develop it.” The public is welcome on a first-come, first-served basis (with priority given to registrants) to attend the performance and jam at Barnevelder for an unrepeatable, "improv"-free evening.

Participants must register though the Texas Dance Improvisation Festival is completely free of cost.

Find more information or sign up for the full or partial event at tdif.rice.edu.

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Caught Catching at WIP at DNA in NYC

I am performing a new solo called "Caught Catching" at DNA on Sept 18th at 4:30pm!

Works In Progress

Works In Progress provides choreographers the opportunity to expose new pieces to an audience for the first time and to receive written and oral feedback from the audience to take with them as they continue on in their creative process.
——————————————————————————————————-

September 18th and October 23rd

Works in progress is at 4:30pm in the Theatre

http://www.dnadance.org/site/

Thursday, September 2, 2010

2010 Dumbo Dance Festival Schedule Announced!


  • Alenka Cizmesija


  • Anabella Lenzu


  • Catch Me Bird


  • Cecilia Marta Dance Company


  • DemaDanceCompany


  • Enzo Celli


  • Jennifer Muller


  • Jeremy McQueen


  • JuMo Dance


  • Michael-Mao-Dance


WHITE WAVE presents the 10th Anniversary of the DUMBO DANCE FESTIVAL from September 23rd -26th at the WHITE WAVE John Ryan Theater 25 Jay Street, Brooklyn. WHITE WAVE’s Artistic Director Young Soon Kim founded the Festival in 2001, and presented the first event a scant month after 9/11. Now a decade on, the DUMBO DANCE FESTIVAL is a vital component of New York’s contemporary dance scene, featuring the work of young dance artists who have gone on to become important figures in emerging dance. WHITE WAVE has presented over 1200 companies and 5000 performers from over a dozen countries to an audience of more than 52,000 people... so far. Presented in conjunction with the 2010 DUMBO ARTS FESTIVAL, a multi-disciplinary celebration of the neighborhood’s diverse artistic community, the DUMBO DANCE FESTIVAL features exciting work from dance artists in Brooklyn’s vibrant contemporary dance scene, on a bill with rising choreographers from throughout the United States, Europe, and Asia. There are no reservations or advance ticket sales, all seats are first come, first served and all Festival performances are presented FREE/pay-what-you-will.

Thursday, September 23rd at 7:00pm

GALA Performance

Artists / Company NameTitle of Work
Cecilia Marta Dance GroupKush
Loni Landon On The Fence
Michael Mao DanceWeaving
Catch Me Bird (CA)Anvil
Jennifer Muller/The WorksAria (excerpt)
ENZO CELLI (ITALY)IRRITANTE (VEXATIONS)
Christie Zimmerman/z3movement project (IN)Untitled
WHITE WAVE Young Soon Kim Dance CompanyShanghai Dream



Friday, September 24th at 7:00pm - 10:00pm

John Ryan Theater at WHITE WAVE, 25 Jay Street

Festival Performances – Friday, September 24, 7:00pm - 8:00pm

Artists/Company NameTitle of Work
Jennifer PhillipsThe Invasion
Inclined Dance ProjectTrain of Thought
Kristin A. KapustikOn the Porch
Amos PinhasiSans Saens
Sin Ae Park Project (KOREA)The Story of Relationship
ELEA GORANA DANCE COLLECTIVEPas De EVE (solo)
BARKIN/SELISSEN PROJECTOnce
Summation Dance CompanyHeat

Festival Performances – Friday, September 24th, 8:00pm - 9:00pm

Artists/Company NameTitle of Work
Loni LandonOn the Fence
Pascal Rekoert/ FlexicurveWash
Se-Yong KimConflict
Natalia MesaMITOSIS
Christie Zimmerman/z3movement project (IN)The Keyhole
ENZO CELLI (ITALY)PARACASOSCIA
WHITE WAVE Young Soon Kim Dance CompanyShanghai Dream

Festival Performances – Friday, September 24th, 9:00pm - 10:00pm

Artists/Company NameTitle of Work
Tomomi ImaiAbyss
Spark Movement CollectiveTiming
Thomas/Ortiz DanceFrayed Ends
Allison JonesI would Sing
Ilana Webber DanceGo Zeo!
JuMo Dance (UTAH)Prison of Form
Mise en Place Dance (MI)Primary Conduit
Jackie O'Toole and Dancers (PA)Second Star to the Right



Saturday, September 25th, 2:00pm - 4:00pm, 5:00pm - 7:00pm, 8:00pm - 10:00pm

John Ryan Theater at WHITE WAVE, 25 Jay Street

Festival Performances – Saturday, September 25th, 2:00-3:00 pm

Artists/Company NameTitle of Work
Hyung Ji YuAttonement
Christie Zimmerman/z3movement project (IN)Untitled
JIL GUYONWidow's Veil
Palindrome Performance Group (CA)Reflect, Defect, Transfer
Noemi Di GregorioFor Rosa
Blue Muse Dance Maze of the Mind
Anne Burnidge DanceAscent
xodus dance collective25th Hour

Festival Performances – Saturday, September 25th, 3:00-4:00 pm

Artists/Company NameTitle of Work
Anne-Marie Mulgrew and Dance Co.The Big Dance
ANAHATA DancePigeon City (excerpt)AprŽs Moi
Brittany AntleAsslema/Beslema
York Dance WorksScale in Grey
Elinor HarrisonFrank and Mamah
DeMa Dance Company POEMA 15 (I Like For You To Be Still)
Rastro Cancionero
Dawn L. BohnExposed
Meredith HainesInc.

Festival Performances – Saturday, September 25th, 5:00-6:00 pm

Artists/Company NameTitle of Work
Anabella Lenzu/DanceDramaIlusions de Percantas
Flamenco: Inside OutIn the Key of Rhythm
Nicole von ArxImpact
Dawn RobinsonPhoenix The Rising
Yuka KamedaPassion ( Tap X Japanese Instrumental)
Eunhey JangThe Circle
Tzu-Ying LeeThe Land Between Us
Artis SmithChickadees Titmice & Nuthatches

Festival Performances – Saturday, September 25th, 6:00-7:00 pm

Artists/Company NameTitle of Work
MegLouise Dance (OH)To Live is so Startling
Rainy DemersonUgly
Becca Alaly + Dancers in collaboration with Mike DonahueTHE PERFECT Little BOULDER
Ellie Leonhardt (TX)Encapsulating
Barbara Mahler Makes DancesDisplaced Damsel
Yoo & DancersCatwalk
Lauren Elizabeth PanzicaNot What It Seems
Angelo Dance ProjectVenia
Alenka CizmesijaIn Between Beneath and Above

Festival Performances – Saturday, September 25th, 8:00-9:00 pm

Artists/Company NameTitle of Work
Catch Me Bird (CA)Anvil
Brittany Antle...do us part
Otis Donovan HerringAttempting to Reconcile
Mare HieronimusSpun
Mise en Place DancePrimary Conduit
Mari Meade Dance CollectiveIndirectly In, Directly
ENZO CELLI (ITALY)IRRITANTE
Lyndsey VaderA Shell of Herself
WHITE WAVE Young Soon Kim Dance CompanyShanghai Dream

Festival Performances – Saturday, September 25th, 9:00-10:00 pm

Artists/Company NameTitle of Work
Sasha Soreff Dance TheaterShoelaces
Michael Mao DanceWeaving
Nu Dance TheaterElle d' Elles ( her from Hers)
Tap into the Soul (CT)Man In the Mirror
Palindrome Performance Group (CA)Dancing Larry
Jeremy McQueenLamentation
Kathleen Dyer/ KDNYEvergreen (excerpt)
Amanda Selwyn Dance TheatrePassage



Saturday, September 25th, 11:00am - 7:00pm

Site Specific Performances – (Along the Pier 1 Waterfront)

Click for Site-Specific Performance Schedule PDF




Sunday, September 26th, 1:00pm - 2:00pm *

* Outdoor performances will take place in the Brooklyn Bridge Park (on the waterfront under the Manhattan Bridge)

Outdoor Festival Performances – Sunday, September 26th, 1:00-2:00pm

Artists/ Company NameTitle of Work
Meredith HainesInc.
xodus dance collective25th Hour
Loni LandonOn the Fence
Sasha Soreff Dance TheaterShoelaces
Ilana Webber DanceGo Zeo!
Amanda Selwyn Dance TheatrePassage

Outdoor Festival Performances – Sunday, September 26th, 2:00pm - 3:00pm

Artists/ Company NameTitle of Work
Theodora BoguszewskiCommunion
Simone SobersAll She Can Carry (excerpt)
Mari Meade Dance CollectiveThe Dirt Belies Us
Dawn L. BohnExposed
Blue Muse Dancethe maze of the mind
Angelo Dance ProjectVenia
Cecilia Marta Dance CompanyKush



Sunday, September 26th, 4:00pm - 7:00pm

John Ryan Theater at WHITE WAVE, 25 Jay Street

Sunday, September 26th, 4:00pm - 6:00pm

Artists/ Company NameTitle of Work
Sue Bernhard DanceworksTerritory
Theodora BoguszewskiCorridor
Catey Ott Dance CollectiveMidnight Potion
Sin Ae Park Project (KOREA)The Story of Relationship
Ellie Leonhardt (TX)Encapsulating
Allison JonesJaw Grind
DeMa Dance CompanyPOEMA 15 I like for you to be still
Simone SobersAll she Can Carry (excerpt)



Sunday, September 26th, 4:00pm - 7:00pm

John Ryan Theater at WHITE WAVE, 25 Jay Street

Sunday, September 26th, 5:00pm - 6:00pm

Artists/ Company NameTitle of Work
Carley EckertCircumstance, Chance, Situation
Ebex DanceI is for...
EDGAR CORTESUnicornius (solo from full length piece)
Lindy SchmedtAmbient Forms
Rainwater DancesThis is What I Think of Your Love
Carlos Fittante/BALAM Dance TheatreThe Melon Peel
JuMo Dance (UTAH)Prison of Form
CPD PlusDo Lord
Cecilia Marta Dance CompanyKush



Sunday, September 26th, 8:00pm - 10:00pm

Grande Finale Performances – Sunday, September 26th, 8:00pm at Fulton Ferry Landing

Artists/ Company NameTitle of Work
Sobers & GodleyLe Chord-on Bleu
Theodora BoguszewskiCommunion
DeMa Dance CompanyPOEMA 15 (I Like For You To Be Still)
Jennifer Muller/The WorksIsland (excerpt)
ENZO CELLI (ITALY)Paracasoscia
Mana Kawamura/ Kawamura the 3rdcloudburst
WHITE WAVE Young Soon Kim Dance CompanyShanghai Dream



Special Thanks to our supporters:

NYCT

whitewavedance: Just added a new event on DNA World Link

Join  us on Facebook Visit  us on youTube Follow  us on Twitter


The festival includes works by:

Alenka Cizmesija

Allison Jones

Amanda Hinchey & Dancers

Amanda Selwyn Dance Theatre

Amos Pinhasi

Anabella Lenzu/DanceDrama

ANAHATA Dance

Angelo Dance Project

Anne Burnidge Dance

Anne-Marie Mulgrew and Dance Co.

Artis Smith

Barbara Mahler Makes Dances

BARKIN/SELISSEN PROJECT

Becca Alaly + Dancers

Blue Muse Dance

Brittany Antle

Carley Eckert

Carlos Fittante/BALAM Dance Theatre

Catch Me Bird

Catey Ott Dance Collective

Cecilia Marta Dance Company

Christie Zimmerman/z3movement project

CPD Plus

Dawn L. Bohn

Dawn Robinson

DeMa Dance Company

Ebex Dance

EDGAR CORTES

ELEA GORANA DANCE COLLECTIVE

Elinor Harrison

Ellie Leonhardt

ENZO CELLI

Eunhey Jang

Flamenco: Inside Out

Hyung Ji Yu

Ilana Webber Dance

Inclined Dance Project

Jackie O'Toole and Dancers

Jennifer Phillips

Jeremy McQueen

JIL GUYON

JuMo Dance

Kathleen Dyer/ KDNY

Kristin A. Kapustik

Lauren Elizabeth Panzica

Lindy Schmedt

Loni Landon/ Nomadic Dance

Lyndsey Vader

Mare Hieronimus

Mari Meade Dance Collective

MegLouise Dance

Meredith Haines

Michael Mao Dance

Mise en Place Dance

Natalia Mesa

Nicole von Arx

Noemi Di Gregorio

Nu Dance Theater

Otis Donovan Herring

Palindrome Performance Group

Pascal Rekoert/ Flexicurve

Rainwater Dances

Rainy Demerson

Rastro

Sasha Soreff Dance Theater

Se-Yong Kim

Simone Sobers

Sin Ae Park Project

Spark Movement Collective

Sue Bernhard Danceworks

Summation Dance Company

Tap into the Soul

Theodora Boguszewski

Thomas/Ortiz Dance

Tomomi Imai

Tzu-Ying Lee

WHITE WAVE Young Soon Kim Dance Company

xodus dance collective

Yoo & Dancers

York Dance Works

Yuka Kameda

Azul Dance Theatre

Front Street Dance Theatre

Jamal Jackson Dance Company

James R Atkinson

KALAMANDIR DANCE COMPANY

Kawamura the 3rd

Kuan-Yu Chen

Liz Piccoli

Movement of the People Dance Company

Neva Cockrell/ Raphael Sacks

Rebecca Patek

Sobers & Godley

Spark Movement Collective

Wan-Jung Wei

Yuki Nishiyama